Re: [sig-policy] IPv4 transfer proposals {Security = Unclassified}
Hi Owen,
From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] IPv4 transfer proposals {Security = Unclassified}
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:15:09 -0800
| I would support prop-095 if it were modified that the
| transferor policies of the source registry and the transferee
| policies of the recipient registry were the ones applied.
Can I confirm your suggestion?
Currently, we define:
a) source -> APNIC account holder
APNIC account holder have to fulfill the source RIR's requirement
b) APNIC account holder -> recipient
Recipient fulfill the APNIC's requirement
You mean,
a) source -> APNIC account holder
1. APNIC account holder have to fulfill the source RIR's requirement
2. source have to fulfill the APNIC's requirement
b) APNIC account holder -> recipient
1. Recipient fulfil the APNIC's requirement
2. APNIC account holder have to fulfill the recipient RIR's requirement
Could you please teach me my understanding is correct?
| I tentatively support prop-095 as it is written, but, note that it
| may be incompatible with the proposed globally coordinated
| policy and/or policies under consideration in other regions.
As you say, ARIN's current ARIN's global coordinated policy proposal
looks more flexible than ours.
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2011_1.html
However, in both proposal, I think we need prop-096.
> .ARIN's current policy
> .
> .Draft Policy ARIN-2011-1
> .Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy
> .
> .Version/date: 23 December 2011
> .
> .Policy statement:
> .
> .Any RIR's resource registrant may transfer IPv4 addresses to the
> .resource registrant of another RIV as long as the two RIRs agree and
> .maintain compatible, needs-based transfer policies thavt exercise
> .Internet stewardship consistent with the values expressed in RFC2050.
> .
> .Rationale: Since individual RIRs now allow transfers, it makes sense to
> .be able to transfer between regions as well.
> .
> .Timetable for implementation: upon ratification by the ARIN Board of
> Trustees
Yours Sincerely,
--
Tomohiro Fujisaki