Re: [sig-policy] prop-086-v003: Global Policy for IPv4 Allocations by th

To: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-086-v003: Global Policy for IPv4 Allocations by the IANA Post, Exhaustion
From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail dot com>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:27:48 -0700
Cc: APNIC Policy SIG List <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <m27hcvo6ek.wl%randy at psg dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4D5E3899.8020201@lahai.com> <AANLkTim3Zd+7KMH1vQo7a0UKuV_XtO=Q3vCS-zA=5Bkc@mail.gmail.com> <m27hcvo6ek.wl%randy@psg.com>

>> I typically take silence as consent
>
> in this case, that would be very ill advised.  i would take it more as
> good manners in dealing with americans trying to tell others what to do

Even when those Americans are trying to find a way to allow returned
resources to make it out of our region?
~Chris

>
> randy
>