At 11:26 AM 02/02/11, Dean Pemberton wrote:
The more we can do to encourage people to adopt IPv6 and ease there reliance on large IPv4 allocations the better. Dolling IPv4 addresses out in ever smaller amounts to people who refuse to adopt IPv6 just seems like we're drip-feeding an unhealthy addiction.
Hear, hear!And also one of my reasons for prop-91 - leaving too many small allocations available around may also have the same effect, and encourage people to focus on getting around the policy rather than getting on with IPv6.
Regards, David