Re: [sig-policy] prop-081: Eligibility for assignments fromthe final /8
Hash: SHA1
Terence Zhang YH(CNNIC) wrote:
> Disclaimer: the comments below reflect the views of the proposal authors and
> have NO link to co-chair's opinion about this proposal
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Critical infrastructure/IXP/Multihoming applicants may not be able to justify a /22 requirement,
> currently half of the assignments made in AP region is /24, besides that, the criterias for
> allocations and assignments are some how different.
>
> We currently allow allocations and assignments, but prop-062 only allow allocations.
>
> We are not trying to fulfil every needs, just try to be fair and consistent.
Fairness is a good idea, but
you are looking at specific needs.
The current final /8 policy to me seems
the most fair.
IMHO consistency ends when that last /8 is
handed to RIRs. No more IPv4. nada.
Regards,
Seiichi
>
>
> Regards
>
> Terence
> CNNIC
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Randy Bush" <randy at psg dot com>
> To: "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp>
> Cc: <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 9:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-081: Eligibility for assignments fromthe final /8
>
>
>> < chair hat = off >
>>
>>> I think it could be possible that there will be needs for these
>>> assignments if there is a new gTLD/ccTLD set up as critical
>>> infrastructure, and we could also have new IXPs or multi-homed
>>> networks. We constantly make 3-4 assignments/year for these use
>>> within JP.
>> ixps, multi-homed networks, etc. are precisely the users expected for
>> prop-062. so why is the final /8 olicy not satisfactory for them all
>> of a sudden?
>>
>> let us remember, we will be out of ipv4 space. we will simply not be
>> able to fulfil every need.
>>
>> randy
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAkuEkq4ACgkQcrhTYfxyMkIWrQCfc1t8jqBKLbMzTuwKGfhXf4S3
g0wAni2wMCuamrkifCfmXQjDddAx7rWw
=mKwl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----