Re: [sig-policy] prop-081: Eligibility for assignments fromthe final /8
Disclaimer: the comments below reflect the views of the proposal authors and
have NO link to co-chair's opinion about this proposal
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Critical infrastructure/IXP/Multihoming applicants may not be able to justify a /22 requirement,
currently half of the assignments made in AP region is /24, besides that, the criterias for
allocations and assignments are some how different.
We currently allow allocations and assignments, but prop-062 only allow allocations.
We are not trying to fulfil every needs, just try to be fair and consistent.
Regards
Terence
CNNIC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Bush" <randy at psg dot com>
To: "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp>
Cc: <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-081: Eligibility for assignments fromthe final /8
>< chair hat = off >
>
>> I think it could be possible that there will be needs for these
>> assignments if there is a new gTLD/ccTLD set up as critical
>> infrastructure, and we could also have new IXPs or multi-homed
>> networks. We constantly make 3-4 assignments/year for these use
>> within JP.
>
> ixps, multi-homed networks, etc. are precisely the users expected for
> prop-062. so why is the final /8 olicy not satisfactory for them all
> of a sudden?
>
> let us remember, we will be out of ipv4 space. we will simply not be
> able to fulfil every need.
>
> randy
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net