Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] prop-062-v001: Use of final /8

To: David Woodgate <David.Woodgate at telstra dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] prop-062-v001: Use of final /8
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:26:05 -0700
Cc: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann dot org>, APNIC Policy SIG List <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <200807162318.m6GNIedT098289 at burn dot telstra dot net>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200807160431.m6G4VA28084482@burn.telstra.net> <C4A371B1.3C1FC%leo.vegoda@icann.org> <200807162318.m6GNIedT098289@burn.telstra.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)

> growth & aggregation efficiency.

given the lack of beneficial effect of current policies on routing table
garbage, i am not sure we can say much here that speaks more loudly than
a routing table well over half full of /24s.  deaggregation seems to be
driven by traffic engineering, false security, and multihoming not policy.

randy