Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocati
On 05/02/2008 15:11, "Jonny Martin" <jonny at jonnynet dot net> wrote:
> I would prefer that that the "plan" to advertise was in fact a
> "requirement" to advertise, however I'm happy either way. (And I
> hope that the 'plan to advertise' is not misconstrued in the same way
> that the 'plan for 200 assignments' in current policy seems to have
Perhaps "an intent to advertise" would remove any ambiguity?
(Not based in APNIC's service region)