Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocati
> On 05/02/2008 15:11, "Jonny Martin" <jonny at jonnynet dot net> wrote:
>> I would prefer that that the "plan" to advertise was in fact a
>> "requirement" to advertise, however I'm happy either way. (And I
>> hope that the 'plan to advertise' is not misconstrued in the same way
>> that the 'plan for 200 assignments' in current policy seems to have
> Perhaps "an intent to advertise" would remove any ambiguity?
I thought Jonny's point was the other way, that the plan for routing
should be more concrete than the context of 'plan for 200 assignments'.
> Leo Vegoda
> (Not based in APNIC's service region)
(one of the three from JP)