Re: [sig-policy] policy proposal of applying HD ratio to IPv4
It's a little more specific than my previous comment, so I'd like to
share them here.
+ The proposal is no longer valid as the original assumption
(correlation between network size and the 80% problem) is broken
+ It is difficult for LIRs to judge an appropriate utilization. The
criteria does not really matter as long as the upstream registry is
flexible to LIR's situation.
Izumi
on behalf of JP community
Kenny Huang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> APNIC secretariat was tasked with the following action from APNIC 20.
> To refer further discussion of the policy proposal of applying HD ratio to
> IPv4 to the mailing list.
>
> This email is sent on behalf of the Policy SIG chairs.
>
> At APNIC 20, the APNIC secretariat presented findings from the LIR survey to
> help progress discussions of the policy proposal [prop-020- v001]
> "Application of HD ratio to IPv4"
>
> The survey concluded that:
> -40% reported they had problems reaching 80% utilization -There is no strong
> correlation between 80% utilization problems and network size and complexity
> measured and based on
> -number of POPs
> -number of services deployed
> -number of levels of hierarchy
>
> The LIR survey results slides and transcripts is available at http://
> www.apnic.net/meetings/20/programme/sigs/policy.html
>
> The history and status of the prop-020-v001 can be found at http://
> www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals/prop-020-v001.html
>
> The question to be answered by those on this list is :
>
> "Do you support proposal [prop-020-v001] "Application of the HD ratio to
> IPv4"
> as a replacement for the current 80% measure of utilisation."
>
> Please submit your opinions to this list, to assist us as chairs in deciding
> what to do with this proposal.
>
> Kind regards,
> Kenny Huang
> Policy SIG chair
>
>
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>