Re: [sig-policy] policy proposal of applying HD ratio to IPv4
expressed to apply HD-ratio in IPv4.
I'm not sure how serious the problem is (or had been?) for 40% of the
LIRs in reaching 80% utilization, but perhaps, lowering the flat %
could be one solution to consider?
Izumi Okutani
JPNIC
Kenny Huang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> APNIC secretariat was tasked with the following action from APNIC 20.
> To refer further discussion of the policy proposal of applying HD ratio to
> IPv4 to the mailing list.
>
> This email is sent on behalf of the Policy SIG chairs.
>
> At APNIC 20, the APNIC secretariat presented findings from the LIR survey to
> help progress discussions of the policy proposal [prop-020- v001]
> "Application of HD ratio to IPv4"
>
> The survey concluded that:
> -40% reported they had problems reaching 80% utilization -There is no strong
> correlation between 80% utilization problems and network size and complexity
> measured and based on
> -number of POPs
> -number of services deployed
> -number of levels of hierarchy
>
> The LIR survey results slides and transcripts is available at http://
> www.apnic.net/meetings/20/programme/sigs/policy.html
>
> The history and status of the prop-020-v001 can be found at http://
> www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals/prop-020-v001.html
>
> The question to be answered by those on this list is :
>
> "Do you support proposal [prop-020-v001] "Application of the HD ratio to
> IPv4"
> as a replacement for the current 80% measure of utilisation."
>
> Please submit your opinions to this list, to assist us as chairs in deciding
> what to do with this proposal.
>
> Kind regards,
> Kenny Huang
> Policy SIG chair
>
>
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>