[sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6p
> > My only agenda is correcting a mistake.
> And what mistake may that be? That KRNIC/NIDA can't get its
> own way all
> the time?
Are you representing Cisco?
Are you getting approval from your seniors every time
you send mail to the list?
Please, take this into account when you send future mails.
As "I" said earlier my whole intention is correcting the mistakes,
and elaborate the process if we all agree.
About the proposal, let it follow the process.
(Open discussions, proper decisions, and so forth)
Let the proposal be dealt with proper reasoning.
> While KRNIC/NIDA may dictate to its membership what does and doesn't
> happen in Korea, this is not what happens in the rest of the Internet.
> Did you consult with your membership in an open forum about all the
> APNIC policy proposals which were proposed in Hanoi? Not that
> I can find
> any evidence of, that's for sure.
> I don't recall anyone from KRNIC standing up at the APNIC meeting and
> saying "we discussed this with our membership, and X% thought it was a
> great idea, and Y% thought is was bad". I recall one NIR that
> gave this
> sort of input, and they are to be congratulated for encouraging open
> dialogue within the community.
> So KRNIC/NIDA clearly makes decisions on what is good and bad for its
> membership. Same way as you clearly now want to make decisions on what
> is good and bad for the APNIC membership.
> > And if we need, examine(or elaborate) our policy
> development process.
> Ah yes, the new policy which says that everything that KRNIC wants is
> automatically approved regardless of people's opinions? Mmmm,
> I can see
> that one being very popular (not!).