Randy and all:
My objection to prop-061 is such:
I agree it is a good idea to have some ASN reserved for documentation purposes. However, they should not come out of APNIC allocated ASN pool. It is best be addressed at other forum (IETF/ICANN, etc.).
yi
----- Original Message ----
From: Randy Bush randy@psg.com
To: Policy SIG sig-policy@apnic.net
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 11:29:57 PM
Subject: [sig-policy] last call: prop-061: Autonomous System Numbers (ASN) for documentation purposes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
prop-061: Autonomous System Numbers (ASN) for documentation purposes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear colleagues
This is the final call for comments on policy proposal prop-061,
"32-bit ASNs for documentation purposes".
This proposal was presented at APNIC 26 and was accepted by consensus.
The proposal has been submitted to the Policy SIG mailing list for an
eight-week discussion period. At the end of that period, if consensus
appears to have been achieved, the Policy SIG Chair will ask the
Executive Council to endorse the proposal for implementation.
* Send all comments and questions to: sig-policy@apnic.net
* Deadline for comments: 24 October 2008
Proposal details
----------------
APNIC to assign a block of 16 AS numbers from both the 16-bit and
32-bit AS number pools for documentation purposes.
Proposal details including the full text of the proposal,
presentations, links to relevant meeting archives and links to
mailing list discussions are available at:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-061-v002.html
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
