Keyboard Shortcuts
Thread View
j: Next unread messagek: Previous unread messagej a: Jump to all threadsj l: Jump to MailingList overview
Hi all,
After my previous response to Owen, I can't find anymore any the text in the actual policy (neither guidelines) about assignments. So, I'm wondering if I was wrong, or it has been removed at some point and I don't recall it ... Could the secretariat point out to the specific text about that? If it has been removed, clearly there is a need to further update section 2.2.3 to remove that reference and avoid the mismatch.
One more request for the secretariat. Could you please provide stats on the number of ISP (not end-users) assignments, for example in the last 12-15 years, in order to understand if this is a real requirement?
Anyone can provide examples of why an ISP could need and assignment instead of using their own allocation?
Thanks!
Regards, Jordi @jordipalet
********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
Hi Jordi and all,
Will respond on Monday as we're currently recuperating from the APRICOT week :) Stay tuned.
Sanjaya
Sent from my mobile.
________________________________ From: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet@consulintel.es Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2020 1:20:59 PM To: mailman_SIG-policy sig-policy@apnic.net Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
Hi all,
After my previous response to Owen, I can't find anymore any the text in the actual policy (neither guidelines) about assignments. So, I'm wondering if I was wrong, or it has been removed at some point and I don't recall it ... Could the secretariat point out to the specific text about that? If it has been removed, clearly there is a need to further update section 2.2.3 to remove that reference and avoid the mismatch.
One more request for the secretariat. Could you please provide stats on the number of ISP (not end-users) assignments, for example in the last 12-15 years, in order to understand if this is a real requirement?
Anyone can provide examples of why an ISP could need and assignment instead of using their own allocation?
Thanks!
Regards, Jordi @jordipalet
********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
Of course, no issue, thanks!
Safe flights for everyone!
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 22/2/20 12:21, "Sanjaya Sanjaya" sanjaya@apnic.net escribió:
Hi Jordi and all,
Will respond on Monday as we're currently recuperating from the APRICOT week :) Stay tuned.
Sanjaya
Sent from my mobile.
From: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet@consulintel.es Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2020 1:20:59 PM To: mailman_SIG-policy sig-policy@apnic.net Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
Hi all,
After my previous response to Owen, I can't find anymore any the text in the actual policy (neither guidelines) about assignments. So, I'm wondering if I was wrong, or it has been removed at some point and I don't recall it ... Could the secretariat point out to the specific text about that? If it has been removed, clearly there is a need to further update section 2.2.3 to remove that reference and avoid the mismatch.
One more request for the secretariat. Could you please provide stats on the number of ISP (not end-users) assignments, for example in the last 12-15 years, in order to understand if this is a real requirement?
Anyone can provide examples of why an ISP could need and assignment instead of using their own allocation?
Thanks!
Regards, Jordi @jordipalet
********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
Hello Jordi,
On 22/02/2020 2:20 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Hi all,
After my previous response to Owen, I can't find anymore any the text in the actual policy (neither guidelines) about assignments. So, I'm wondering if I was wrong, or it has been removed at some point and I don't recall it ... Could the secretariat point out to the specific text about that? If it has been removed, clearly there is a need to further update section 2.2.3 to remove that reference and avoid the mismatch.
You mean section 2.2.3 text? It is not removed. You can find it in the current policy manual here
https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/resources#2.2.3.-Assigned-address-spa...
One more request for the secretariat. Could you please provide stats on the number of ISP (not end-users) assignments, for example in the last 12-15 years, in order to understand if this is a real requirement?
Noted! Secretariat will provide the stats soon.
Regards Sunny
Anyone can provide examples of why an ISP could need and assignment instead of using their own allocation?
Thanks!
Regards, Jordi @jordipalet
IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
Hi Jordi,
On 24/02/2020 1:39 pm, Srinivas (Sunny) Chendi wrote:
One more request for the secretariat. Could you please provide stats on the number of ISP (not end-users) assignments, for example in the last 12-15 years, in order to understand if this is a real requirement?
Noted! Secretariat will provide the stats soon.
Regards Sunny
To date we have delegated portable assignments to 547 ISPs. Some common reasons for this include:
- Assignment to operate IXP - Historical Resource assignments - M&A of members who held assignments - Assignment for ISP infrastructure
Regards Sunny
Activity Summary
- 1304 days inactive
- 1304 days old
- sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
- 3 participants
- 4 comments