Activity Summary
- 2893 days inactive
- 2893 days old
- sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2/26/15 9:40 PM, Masato Yamanishi wrote:
Owen,
I don't want to discuss too much details since I'm acting chair, but I'm afraid that "unique routing policy" is vague and it may qualify some usecases that private AS may also work.
Can't agree more here with the Chair. There can be a unique routing policy even if you are single homed, if you are doing AS-PATH Poisoning. Controversial, but then as we like to say, my network my rules.
Another example may be sending different BGP communities per prefix through AS-Boundaries. Getting more commonly supported for blackhole routing.
so, unique routing policy cannot be equated with Multihome. We need more clarity on 'unique routing policy', other then just saying multihoming is what defines
- -gaurab