Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: prop-130-v001: Modification of transfer policies
Hi Satoru, all,
There are two points here:
1) Provide clarity about Inter/Intra-RIR. It is not clear in actual policy if it is referring only to Intra-RIR M&A or also Inter-RIR. It seems clear that because there is a policy for Inter-RIR transfers, the M&As should also support Inter-RIR.
2) The actual policy, only talks about "mergers & acquisitions". So, taking advantage of the change required for 1 above, I think is nice to ensure that we also mention relocations and reorganizations, and both partial or complete. Again, allows having a clear interpretation and not leaving it to a subjective reading.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 2/9/19 17:38, "Satoru Tsurumaki" <sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net en nombre de satoru.tsurumaki@g.softbank.co.jp> escribió:
Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.
I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-130, based
on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals.
Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons
that they don't imagine the reason why we need to change the policy.
Best Regards,
Satoru Tsurumaki
JPOPF-ST
2019年3月14日(木) 21:59 Sumon Ahmed Sabir <sasabir@gmail.com>:
>
>
> Dear SIG members,
>
> The proposal "prop-130-v001: Modification of transfer policies"
> has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
>
> It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 48 in
> Chiang Mai, Thailand on Thursday, 12 September 2019.
>
> We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list
> before the meeting.
>
> The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an
> important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to
> express your views on the proposal:
>
> - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
> - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
> tell the community about your situation.
> - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
> effective?
>
> Information about this proposal is available at:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-130
>
> Regards
>
> Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.