Hi Satoru, all,
Thanks again for your contribution.
There are many ways to protect a whois “email” from spam. For example, you can request a manual intervention to actually “see” the email.
I think this is an operational issue outside of the scope of the PDP, and should be sorted out by the staff.
Also, this concern is the same for any email published in the whois, not just our policy proposal, right?
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.
I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-125,
based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.
Many supporting opinions were expressed on this proposal.
- Agree, you should.
- When mail address is posted in whois DB, a lot of SPAM is sent. We should take some measures.
2018-08-17 14:52 GMT+11:00 Sumon Ahmed Sabir <email@example.com>:
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.