Hi all, - Do you support or oppose the proposal? I don`t support this proposal. - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal? It is blocking the freedom of internet included business transfer or marketing selling. - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? I think for now, the policy is already protected the final /8, due to the current policy is only accept the owner to transfer to the new owner after 1 year membership, that`s mean people cannot just open a new account and sell it at the same time. They must pay cost and time to holding the resource. At this point, that is already enough for protecting the last /8 IP address . And APNIC can also monitoring the BGP routing table, to be confirm the new assigned IP block is routed on the public internet. - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective? "prohibit to transfer" is not work at all. APNIC can monitor the routed IP on the public routing table. and set a deadline (e.g 6 months) , in case no routed on the Internet after 6 months, APNIC can withdraw the IP address from the member. Best Regards, Ernest Tse Pacswitch Globe Telecom Ltd. // Web: http://www.pacswitch.com // Tel: +852-21570550 //Mobile: +852-62536678 //Skype: codesixs On Wed, 23/08/2017 15.50, Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com> wrote:
|