Hello,I oppose this proposal as written.I do not believe this policy proposal benefits network operations.
believe it is intended to further the goals of the policy proposer and the company he owns/works at, which exists to earn money from the sale and leasing of IP address blocks (per their website).
If the policy proposal has shed light on some deficiencies in the Membership Agreement (found at: https://www.apnic.net/about-apnic/corporate- ), then I suggest it would be helpful for the policy proposer to work with APNIC staff and/or the EC, rather than through the Policy SIG.documents/documents/ membership/membership- agreement/
Thank you,DavidDavid Huberman | Principal Program Manager
Oracle Cloud
1501 4th Ave #1800Seattle, WA 98101USA
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy