Re: [sig-policy] prop-119: Temporary transfers, to be discussed at APNIC
Thank you for the reply.
(snip)
>> I do not believe that spammer would benefit from this policy as they
>> would have to register with APNIC as members and provide all the
>> needed paperwork such as company registration papers, ID/passports,
>> billing address etc...
>
>
> It will definitely support the spammers by all means. You temperorary
> transfer resource to Spammer, they do their thing and get black listed
> everywhere and then you get the resources back and ask everyone that we are
> the new owner of this resource so kindly remove all the listing. REPEAT.
agree.
This proposal support the spammer and the LIR who support or earn
income from the spammer.
I'm afraid that those spammer and LIR can transfer the address
resources more freely and frequency if both prop-119 and prop-118 will
be a consensus.
Satoru Tsurumaki
>
>>
>> They are much better off renting a /24 from the black market with no
>> traces or documented changes ion the address block.
>
>
> Yup, let them pay black market rates for black market business model.
>
> And what will be the temporary transfer fees? same as permanent transfer
> fees? or free?
>
> In order to resolve a corner case it will open up opertunities for spammers.
> I stronly oppose it.
> --
> Best Wishes,
>
> Aftab A. Siddiqui
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy