“Or.. Just get over with it :)” +1 I think spending time and effort on IPv4 policy is just purposeless. Realistically, the people who are commercially wedded to that platform will do whatever it takes to keep afloat for as long as they can. Trying to make IPv4 Policy
‘work right’ will be like playing “Whack-a-Mole” as the desperate players display every bit of ingenuity and rat cunning they possess to stay in the game, until their business model eventually becomes untenable. Regards Mike From: sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net [mailto:sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net]
On Behalf Of Aftab Siddiqui prop-116 is similar to prop-106 with few cosmetic changes so it would be good to review the old discussion.
Yes, there is a better way, scrap prop-105 and stop handing over additional /22 for no reason and add the recovered resources to final /8 pool. Or.. Just get over with it :) -- Best Wishes, Aftab A. Siddiqui The information contained in this Internet Email
message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged
information, but not necessarily the official views or opinions of the New
Zealand Defence Force. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
use, disclose, copy or
distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately.
|