Date Prev
Date Next
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Date Index
Thread Index
[sig-policy] The status of APNIC's IPv4 resources
To
: "
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
" <
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>
Subject
: [sig-policy] The status of APNIC's IPv4 resources
From
: Masato Yamanishi <
myamanis at gmail dot com
>
Date
: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:59:02 +0900
Delivered-to
:
sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
Dkim-signature
: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rDEQBPwp+wDOy03d6wl1w5vV7X8HRXPeJ1ax+3uGW7Y=; b=egs09ebQiuRXVI3v4P/fQcdIudX5s/CMSzxGWvDaP0LeHTQOodTgAa6YXw+WUMOArU zE5eMMXdaPKWoo2lOlowHxLUHdpze9iPmyy7Sbo/FJScNlK3CNJjiy7n+UrfamVpKNOP 3b+F5hvRbsOjuim8fHgmjoFX8cXA1LOvFGrbxBRgMmoXmmTt5eebFa/VoTiULB/DCr9b D3yTSzzP9zrCTKqi3fvKmxDzEjYVd8INjXg0qgYf3wWX0k0dTlkyrNCkZUzNNyNwTkCz 4/sCYm1haoy39vE+EE2XzQf32YJPEoCNEABxImdlroTT9rs/ZPCXLjvmUVppdINm0v5i pPPA==
List-archive
: <
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/
>
List-help
: <
mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help
>
List-id
: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post
: <
mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
>
List-subscribe
: <
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>, <
mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe
>
Dear Colleagues,
In Jakarta, Geoff Huston presented the status of our IPv4 resources, in particular about exhaustion and transfer,
and some participants asked to summarize and post it to the list for further discussion.
Following is Chairs' summary of the presentation and discussion.
1.
Status of APNIC Final /8 pool (103/8)
-
Will run out ~4-5 years
2.
Status of IANA Recovered pool (non-103)
-
Will run out in next 7 months+
-
IANA may allocate additional space in every 6 months
- This pool will repeatedly ‘run-out’ as IANA delegates more space and it is distributed by APNIC
- May n
eed policy to deal with temporary exhaustion of the non-103 pool
-> Close the door when exhausted or create the waiting list and put further applications to there?
3. Some address spaces in 103/8 were transferred within 12months since initial allocation
- There is no policy to prohibit it while the Secretariat asks in review process
While 3rd point was not included in SIG Chair report presented in AMM as the time was very limited,
I would like to ask you consider this point also.
It is very appreciated if you make a comment and discuss further.
Regards,
Masato Yamanishi
APNIC SIG Chair
Date Prev
Date Next
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Date Index
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Date Index
Thread Index
Prev by Date:
[sig-policy] Discussion before vs after asking consensus
Previous by Thread:
[sig-policy] Discussion before vs after asking consensus
Index(es):
Date
Thread