Re: [sig-policy] Prop-115 returned to author for further consideration

To: Owen DeLong <owen at delong dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Prop-115 returned to author for further consideration
From: Andy Linton <asjl at nsrc dot org>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:04:54 +0600
Cc: "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lpnz.org; s=dkim; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=QYVD8WL3JwJ5DJWqyfbNj7mBtICOtjrX8BcsX/E3ML0=; b=oYdTRovCaagrRdYTNfepK5F8ZKB4wSnLHV6DNbD1vtg9t2V3jPp26Fkw9WSt66o9mX lhDXBo3PIgxBVvbskq2vRMpB0D6iWToo4xixLEgkoFnFTAhZSChejbL6Kis5JeMH33aw 8/JpjWKqWmwXrgrytJb3efoEML3qjXu+5hDHo=
In-reply-to: <26B2DD72-A10A-4D35-9FD1-EF6FB13498DB@delong.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALcH-8mPELhJzB37kg8xP07WBLG56Lc77_u2COE8Py9KLmqvCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEX38CPk4gTq8M3AGCY=1oWzAJN3Dh09YwJc4L=A7BRy=cmRtw@mail.gmail.com> <CAB8BFP5f-YSf5ZMO7mh34aAnoXjFGfj23Xj9gZKk0jroidS+Tw@mail.gmail.com> <26B2DD72-A10A-4D35-9FD1-EF6FB13498DB@delong.com>

I agree.

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong dot com> wrote:

I do not support the proposal.

Contorting policy around the abomination that is CGN instead of recognizing that no amount of policy or other contortion will preserve usability in IPv4 and just getting on with the business of making IPv6 deployment ubiquitous is counterproductive for the internet as a whole and for each and every individual subjected to these ridiculous and dysfunctional hacks.

NAT was bad enough. NAT on top of NAT and so-called “Carrier Grade” NAT and all of these other stupid net tricks are in desperate need of deprecation.