Re: [sig-policy] New version of prop-114: prop-114: Modification in the

To: "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] New version of prop-114: prop-114: Modification in the ASN eligibility criteria
From: Sanjeev Gupta <sanjeev at dcs1 dot biz>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 06:34:42 +0530
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcs1.biz; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=AsehBiJGRSi604hPRU4IgUDuLCC9BT9O2JyOPiQCCig=; b=Z+INrUQi5OGu+NTA0DvmYTt5WABY1rsFzieSqXltx1Ikh7VgkjXX7b5GChxPAMuuFE VE72tzgmUcUcf6Lp82jXXGZaYptcVrGQJRpbfFwD9axzORp2sShqwfAyc/5VyuKXNerU xEJR21c6RaAMS3OFpmUSxJ2U5FL2sh5YfQ18A=
In-reply-to: <54F8F586.3060602 at lahai dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab at lahai dot com> wrote:

"have allocated provider independent address space by
APNIC, AND intend to multi-home in the future"

the 'previous' term is confusing. kind of implies that it doesn't need
to be current allocation (so in theory returned/re-claimed space users
could qualify - though that is not the intention).

It is not just confusing, it is explicitly different.

Aftab, Skeeve, is the "previous" use-case intended?

--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane