Re: [sig-policy] Updated Text

Re: [sig-policy] Updated Text - Prop-114v003

To: Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at v4now dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Updated Text - Prop-114v003
From: Sanjeev Gupta <sanjeev at dcs1 dot biz>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:54:10 +0800
Cc: "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcs1.biz; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=tdLVvCYp/TkttQV67I2aEjciU7AAqUdxg3JyaNrbMM0=; b=KlkksHmIUkfHMq2JXRmijQJbkjAXiD+DWiodshPwCapA1TH3VyIceSrb8g8gbZ03cg DCM/8JYJKOOlwUK6+mOKACvO6BKKiZbicHPm/F7ocFRGdjmj/kje8iEmxsATGpeJgsZd n0nrpdhF/p9rDb6hCQ0MV1ZbKotaLCRNOLyVI=
In-reply-to: <CAEUfUGMhPVVw8xwHeUhbYKsxYssODTbDW8T6BpkWmrDBdH8_RA@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at v4now dot com> wrote:

4. Proposed policy solution
---------------------------

An organisation is eligible for an ASN assignment if:

- they are currently multi-homed OR

- you have been previous allocated provider independent address space by APNIC AND

- intend to multi-home in the future

May I suggest a change?

An organisation is eligible for an ASN assignment if:

- they are currently multi-homed OR

- you are currently allocated provider independent address space by APNIC AND intend to multi-home in the future

The first change is to remove those who are moving to NIRs, or other RIRs. They should apply for resources from their current Registery.

The second change is to clarify that the "AND" in #3 applies to #2, not #1 OR #2.

--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane