Re: [sig-policy] Updated Text - Prop-113v003
Hash: SHA1
With the 'non-removal' of the needs assessment, I am happy to support
this proposal.
thanks
-gaurab
On 3/5/15 4:50 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> The only addition to this text was the clarification of
> demonstrated need. It is not being removed and will remain in
> place as below.
>
> "Organizations requesting a delegation under these terms must
> demonstrate that they are able to use 25% of the requested
> addresses immediately and 50% within one year."
>
> =====
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> prop-113-v003: Modification in the IPv4 eligibility criteria
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Proposer: Aftab Siddiqui
>
> aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com <mailto:aftab.siddiqui at gmail dot com>
>
>
> Skeeve Stevens
>
> skeeve at eintellegonetworks dot com
> <mailto:skeeve at eintellegonetworks dot com>
>
>
>
> 1. Problem statement
>
> --------------------
>
>
> The current APNIC IPv4 delegation policy defines multiple
> eligibility criteria and applicants must meet one criteria to be
> eligible to receive IPv4 resources. One of the criteria dictates
> that “an organization is eligible if it is currently multi-homed
> with provider-based addresses, or demonstrates a plan to multi-home
> within one month” (section 3.3).
>
>
> The policy seems to imply that multi-homing is mandatory even if
> there is no use case for the applicant to be multi-homed or even
> when there is only one upstream provider available, this has
> created much confusion in interpreting this policy.
>
>
> As a result organizations have either tempted to provide incorrect
> or fabricated multi-homing information to get the IPv4 resources or
> barred themselves from applying.
>
>
>
> 2. Objective of policy change
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
> In order to make the policy guidelines simpler we are proposing to
> modify the text of section 3.3.
>
>
>
> 3. Situation in other regions
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
> ARIN:
>
> There is no multi-homing requirement
>
>
> RIPE:
>
> There is no multi-homing requirement.
>
>
> LACNIC:
>
> Applicant can either have multi-homing requirement or
> interconnect.
>
>
> AFRINIC:
>
> There is no multi-homing requirement.
>
>
>
> 4. Proposed policy solution
>
> ---------------------------
>
>
>
>
> Section 3.3: Criteria for small delegations
>
>
> An organization is eligible if:
>
>
> *
>
> it is currently multi-homed OR
>
>
> *
>
> currently utilising provider (ISP) assignment of at least a /24,
> AND intends to be multi-homed OR
>
>
> *
>
> intends to be multi-homed
>
>
> AND
>
>
> *
>
> advertise the prefixes within 6 months
>
>
> Organizations requesting a delegation under these terms must
> demonstrate that they are able to use 25% of the requested
> addresses immediately and 50% within one year.
>
>
> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
> Advantages:
>
>
> Simplifies the process of applying for IPv4 address space for
> small delegations and delays the immediate requirement for
> multi-homing as determined to be appropriate within the timeframe
> as detailed in Section 3.3.
>
>
>
> Disadvantages:
>
>
> There is no known disadvantage of this proposal.
>
>
>
> 6. Impact on resource holders
>
> -----------------------------
>
>
> No impact on existing resource holders.
>
>
>
> 7. References
>
> -------------
>
>
>
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego
> Networks service skeeve at v4now dot com <mailto:skeeve at v4now dot com> ;
> www.v4now.com <http://www.v4now.com/>
>
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/v4now <http://facebook.com/v4now> ;
> <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
>
> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; blog:
> www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
>
>
> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
>
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> * _______________________________________________ sig-policy
> mailing list sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
- --
http://www.gaurab.org.np/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAlT36RYACgkQSo7fU26F3X2XUACgi8eS4uSMM+2WnU+ZoWH6L+jA
fGgAoOUDkwgzOLb2CYtHRsH2Unx3pBXv
=HrSm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----