Re: [sig-policy] New version of prop-114: Modification in the ASN eligib

To: Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab at lahai dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] New version of prop-114: Modification in the ASN eligibility criteria
From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong dot com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:39:32 -0800
Cc: "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1425523173; bh=0/UWkJpcdOVGrssg4WrD2Zr/foE=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=31OmfVVDHfUDzjw4h2OF/mhAn14O72/Jvc5RFkDuFkMcdKZIlT2SiAz+rxzYRL88u hcqBeuRC5C/Vta25I132Mli+1FRmqOmCayPkXy3zPjPMTApb3FmTceQrVo+7yPCHkD I5JP/glssPe7PZRvwlQxx5ehCwCL5xMEQPjJcKk4=
In-reply-to: <54F7C01D.6090806 at lahai dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>

> On Mar 4, 2015, at 18:31 , Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab at lahai dot com> wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 3/5/15 2:13 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> 
>> So, if I wanted to put a connection online in Singapore, and only 
>> connected to one upstream, but also connect to Megaport, or
>> Pacnets PEN - or to Megaports MLPA IX - which is state based - or
>> other fabric, then I could need an ASN, and the routing policy
>> would be unique to that location.  Rinse and repeat for other
>> locations.
>> 
> what prevents you from using the same ASN ?

Exactly.

At the point where you bring up the second site, just peer it with the previous site and it is multihomed. There’s no reason not to run a GRE or other tunnel between the sites and peer them.

Owen