Re: [sig-policy] Policy SIG session schedule

...Skeeve

Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker

v4Now - an eintellego Networks service

skeeve at v4now dot com ; www.v4now.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/v4now ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com

IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Dean Pemberton <dean at internetnz dot net dot nz> wrote:

I agree. Thats why I was in favour of abandoning the AMM consensus.
Unfortunately the policy failed.
--
Dean Pemberton

Technical Policy Advisor
InternetNZ
+64 21 920 363 (mob)
dean at internetnz dot net dot nz

To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp> wrote:
> Great to know this Philip.
>
> We had simliar issue last year, where we discussed about the proposal on
> reserving a space for DNS anycast, and due to parallel session, some
> operators could not attend. It got rediscussed at the AMM and the
> consensus at Policy SIG got reverted. I think it's not efficient that
> consensus decisions needs to be rediscussed due to parallel sessions and
> not everyone could participate at Policy SIG.
>
> I provided input to an APNIC staff after the session last year and would
> like to raise this again.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Izumi
>
>
>
> On 2015/03/02 12:07, Philip Smith wrote:
>> FWIW, a few years ago we did have at least two APRICOTs where there was
>> nothing in parallel with the Thursday Policy SIG. It meant that the
>> technical/ops part of the conference finished on Wednesday. APRICOT 2009
>> was one example - for reference. (And tech/ops people left on Wednesday
>> night.)
>>
>> But we reverted to putting regular conference content in parallel with
>> the Policy SIG following requests and feedback for that.
>>
>> And yes, if there is clear desire from the Policy SIG to be standalone,
>> the APRICOT PC will pay very close attention to that desire. :-)
>>
>> philip
>> --
>>
>>
>> Skeeve Stevens wrote on 2/03/2015 12:04 :
>>> OK... so a year in the future... that should easily be dealt with by
>>> talking to the Apricot Program Committee... as it is a very reasonable
>>> and obvious thing to do.
>>>
>>> Is it possible for this meeting? Competing event for Policy means there
>>> will be little reason to entice people to come .
>>>
>>>
>>> ...Skeeve
>>>
>>> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
>>> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service
>>> skeeve at v4now dot com <mailto:skeeve at v4now dot com> ; www.v4now.com
>>> <http://www.v4now.com/>
>>>
>>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>>>
>>> facebook.com/v4now
>>> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>>> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
>>>
>>> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ;
>>> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com
>>> <mailto:myamanis at gmail dot com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Skeeve,
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I don't think we can change the schedule in this meeting.
>>> I'm asking about future meetings.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Masato
>>>
>>> 2015-03-01 18:46 GMT-08:00 Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at v4now dot com
>>> <mailto:skeeve at v4now dot com>>:
>>>
>>> Masato-san,
>>>
>>> Are you suggesting that we are able to change either Policy or
>>> Lightening talks for this event? I would love to go to both.
>>>
>>> I think this is only really a problem at Apricot events, not
>>> APNIC events.
>>>
>>>
>>> ...Skeeve
>>>
>>> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
>>> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service
>>> skeeve at v4now dot com <mailto:skeeve at v4now dot com> ; www.v4now.com
>>> <http://www.v4now.com/>
>>>
>>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383
>>> <tel:%2B61%20%280%29414%20753%20383> ; skype://skeeve
>>>
>>> facebook.com/v4now
>>> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>>> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
>>>
>>> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ;
>>> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Masato Yamanishi
>>> <myamanis at gmail dot com <mailto:myamanis at gmail dot com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> While this point was raised by Jessica, Skeeve, and Dean
>>> during the ML discussion,
>>> it is also big question for me, which day and time-slot is
>>> best for Policy SIG.
>>>
>>> Historically, we have SIG session somewhere in Thu.
>>> However, do you think it is a barrier for wider participation?
>>> (e.g. many operators are leaving in Thu PM?)
>>>
>>> Also, which session should not be in parallel with Policy SIG?
>>> (I also don't want to miss Lightning talks as Skeeve mentioned)
>>>
>>> Please share your thoughts on this list and/or offline in
>>> Fukuoka.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Masato Yamanishi
>>> APNIC Policy SIG Chair (Acting)
>>>
>>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
>>> policy *
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net <mailto:sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
>>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>>
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy