Re: [sig-policy] Policy SIG session schedule

...Skeeve

Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker

v4Now - an eintellego Networks service

skeeve at v4now dot com ; www.v4now.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/v4now ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com

IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp> wrote:

Great to know this Philip.

We had simliar issue last year, where we discussed about the proposal on
reserving a space for DNS anycast, and due to parallel session, some
operators could not attend. It got rediscussed at the AMM and the
consensus at Policy SIG got reverted. I think it's not efficient that
consensus decisions needs to be rediscussed due to parallel sessions and
not everyone could participate at Policy SIG.

I provided input to an APNIC staff after the session last year and would
like to raise this again.

Thanks,
Izumi

On 2015/03/02 12:07, Philip Smith wrote:
> FWIW, a few years ago we did have at least two APRICOTs where there was
> nothing in parallel with the Thursday Policy SIG. It meant that the
> technical/ops part of the conference finished on Wednesday. APRICOT 2009
> was one example - for reference. (And tech/ops people left on Wednesday
> night.)
>
> But we reverted to putting regular conference content in parallel with
> the Policy SIG following requests and feedback for that.
>
> And yes, if there is clear desire from the Policy SIG to be standalone,
> the APRICOT PC will pay very close attention to that desire. :-)
>
> philip
> --
>
>
> Skeeve Stevens wrote on 2/03/2015 12:04 :
>> OK... so a year in the future... that should easily be dealt with by
>> talking to the Apricot Program Committee... as it is a very reasonable
>> and obvious thing to do.
>>
>> Is it possible for this meeting? Competing event for Policy means there
>> will be little reason to entice people to come .
>>
>>
>> ...Skeeve
>>
>> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
>> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service
>> skeeve at v4now dot com <mailto:skeeve at v4now dot com> ; www.v4now.com
>> <http://www.v4now.com/>
>>
>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>>
>> facebook.com/v4now
>> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
>>
>> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ;
>> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
>>
>>
>> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com
>> <mailto:myamanis at gmail dot com>> wrote:
>>
>> Skeeve,
>>
>> Unfortunately, I don't think we can change the schedule in this meeting.
>> I'm asking about future meetings.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Masato
>>
>> 2015-03-01 18:46 GMT-08:00 Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at v4now dot com
>> <mailto:skeeve at v4now dot com>>:
>>
>> Masato-san,
>>
>> Are you suggesting that we are able to change either Policy or
>> Lightening talks for this event? I would love to go to both.
>>
>> I think this is only really a problem at Apricot events, not
>> APNIC events.
>>
>>
>> ...Skeeve
>>
>> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
>> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service
>> skeeve at v4now dot com <mailto:skeeve at v4now dot com> ; www.v4now.com
>> <http://www.v4now.com/>
>>
>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383
>> <tel:%2B61%20%280%29414%20753%20383> ; skype://skeeve
>>
>> facebook.com/v4now
>> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
>>
>> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ;
>> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
>>
>>
>> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Masato Yamanishi
>> <myamanis at gmail dot com <mailto:myamanis at gmail dot com>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> While this point was raised by Jessica, Skeeve, and Dean
>> during the ML discussion,
>> it is also big question for me, which day and time-slot is
>> best for Policy SIG.
>>
>> Historically, we have SIG session somewhere in Thu.
>> However, do you think it is a barrier for wider participation?
>> (e.g. many operators are leaving in Thu PM?)
>>
>> Also, which session should not be in parallel with Policy SIG?
>> (I also don't want to miss Lightning talks as Skeeve mentioned)
>>
>> Please share your thoughts on this list and/or offline in
>> Fukuoka.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Masato Yamanishi
>> APNIC Policy SIG Chair (Acting)
>>
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
>> policy *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net <mailto:sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>

* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy