Re: [sig-policy] Requirements for Subsequent ASN Requests

To: Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Requirements for Subsequent ASN Requests
From: Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab at lahai dot com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:29:08 +0000
Cc: "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <4C2C33BE-C12F-4A4E-A060-0D7A38F8EB81 at gmail dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAEUfUGNsp=gVJ_+vc2dkY0d9RCqydgUk4VgZbssRXLJqKOzLwA@mail.gmail.com> <8C6700B4-299F-4310-B486-8DDCCEC74FEB@yahoo.com> <210B80A3-A4B8-45A9-A4DF-22247FDB6E68@delong.com> <CALcH-8mge88aCYunivmEA_r_3+e0-hR1=eDXpHKcSHcKeBH1AQ@mail.gmail.com> <B1E1F6F7-F1D2-43B0-A3FD-702AE1ED25DA@delong.com> <4C2C33BE-C12F-4A4E-A060-0D7A38F8EB81@gmail.com>

Hash: SHA1

On 2/26/15 9:40 PM, Masato Yamanishi wrote:
> Owen,
> 
> I don't want to discuss too much details since I'm acting chair,
> but I'm afraid that "unique routing policy" is vague and it may
> qualify some usecases that private AS may also work.

Can't agree more here with the Chair. There can be a unique routing
policy even if you are single homed, if you are doing AS-PATH
Poisoning. Controversial, but then as we like to say, my network my
rules.

Another example may be sending different BGP communities per prefix
through AS-Boundaries. Getting more commonly supported for blackhole
routing.

so, unique routing policy cannot be equated with Multihome. We need
more clarity on 'unique routing policy', other then just saying
multihoming is what defines

- -gaurab

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAlTv5IQACgkQSo7fU26F3X1PLwCeL3SAntJECI3WpVFrT9dtTx1u
91cAoN/ia9mmFF/ybsJ0SCPrrpkd1tId
=jipx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----