On Feb 23, 2015, at 10:21 , Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com> wrote:Dear Colleagues,Regarding prop-113, I saw 3 very simple support and 1 clarification without any negative comment.Isn't there any concern or negative comment?Dean>Can you express your view after clarification?Aflab and Skeeve>If prop-113 will reach consensus but prop-114 will not, is it acceptable initial approach to implement only prop-113?Or, these are inseparable policies?Regards,Masato Yamanishi, Policy SIG Chair (Acting)2015-02-03 22:18 GMT-06:00 Sanjeev Gupta <sanjeev at dcs1 dot biz>:On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com> wrote:The proposal "prop-113: Modification in the IPv4 eligibility criteria"has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.Support.-- Sanjeev Gupta+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy Date PrevDate NextThread PrevThread NextDate IndexThread Index Date PrevDate NextThread PrevThread NextDate IndexThread Index Prev by Date: Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal ] prop-112: On demand expansion of IPv6 address allocation size in legacy IPv6 space [SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED] Previous by Thread: Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal] prop-113: Modification in the IPv4 eligibility criteria Index(es): Date Thread
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myamanis at gmail dot com> wrote:The proposal "prop-113: Modification in the IPv4 eligibility criteria"has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.Support.-- Sanjeev Gupta+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
The proposal "prop-113: Modification in the IPv4 eligibility criteria"has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.