[sig-policy] New version of prop-111: Request-based expansion of IPv6 de
Hi all,
Thank you again for your comments to prop-111.
I got several comments for nibble boundary allocation. I think /28
might be OK, but additional allocation after /28 will be too huge
with this allocation scheme (that will be /24, /20, ...).
Here is current summary of nibble boundary allocation. I would
appreciate your additional opinions.
Advantages:
- ease of address masking and calculation
- ease of DNS reverse delegation set up
Disadvantages:
- LIRs in legacy space cannot extend prefix to /28
- allocation size will be too huge (allocations after /28 will be /24, /20..)
Yours Sincerely,
--
Tomohiro Fujisaki