Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to suppor

To: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to support DNS Infrastructure
From: Sanjeev Gupta <sanjeev at dcs1 dot biz>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:25:03 +0800
Cc: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:x-google-dkim-signature:x-gm-message-state:x-received: mime-version:received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date: message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=vEW0eA6+K6HIWS76+Eg+WLIgqDh65YPy7MhmK8XfQkM=; b=ZGGZ97C1hcULFt4X9EVKnaE4LUhXRY4pSoQEqYkkeEXS7jXIyhDqMPc3Twj3gVZMyiW3ukRX3XoqS /FRIKIe1uHj619DuxrLWvWDwsH2jD3JBbhLEW61EuRkrbf+wkayTkX8be/8KGZ43ATCAjicLxhcN+E 67/mps59GhGKlb8s=
In-reply-to: <m2txcrpmat.wl%randy at psg dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALS-_OpDgBHuAiaXD1AfS3F+UWnfcePXC3yCrnCHHZYKiDPmDg@mail.gmail.com> <m2txcrpmat.wl%randy@psg.com>

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com> wrote:

and why won't this leak and make confusion?

I suppose it will, but the impact of this will be in the control of those who can fix it.

So if I let this leak, I get traffic, and then I tighten my announcement (if I wish). But _you_ leaking it will not affect me.

--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane