Re: [sig-policy] InternetNZ position on prop-105-v001: Distribution of r

To: Dean Pemberton <dean at internetnz dot net dot nz>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] InternetNZ position on prop-105-v001: Distribution of returned IPv4 address blocks
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:58:13 +0900
Cc: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <CAHT1SrHFkh_aFFw93UmR05RpEi82KWCppdF0_-mHjr3w78Dz4w at mail dot gmail dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAHT1SrHFkh_aFFw93UmR05RpEi82KWCppdF0_-mHjr3w78Dz4w@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> additional IPv4 address space

what i wonder is who are the other 30%?  i would think we all need more
ipv4 space.  there is this one little problem.  insert geoff graph here

randy