Re: [sig-policy] prop-106-v001: Restricting excessive IPv4 address trans

To: Owen DeLong <owen at delong dot com>, Terry Manderson <terry at terrym dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-106-v001: Restricting excessive IPv4 address transfers under the final /8 block
From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann dot org>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:15:21 -0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <A4AB6ED8-7123-45BB-B309-89B4FB41E926 at delong dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/options/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CALS-_OpULYxmjRurZh7d=SsCUfgvvkW1PUjTMSbzj9zzKPeZDQ@mail.gmail.com> <4D51592F-AC0C-45AE-B2C9-C63D9FEC7C3F@terrym.net> <A4AB6ED8-7123-45BB-B309-89B4FB41E926@delong.com>
Thread-index: Ac4APRpWxzt8mt4PQe6zb+lrcTegvQAWbPEA
Thread-topic: [sig-policy] prop-106-v001: Restricting excessive IPv4 address transfers under the final /8 block

Owen DeLong wrote:

[...]

> I would propose that any prefix obtained from the last /8 (these are,
after all, easily identifiable)
> simply be excluded from the transfer policy and that all such prefixes be
subject to reclamation
> if the entity which received the prefix ceases operations.

Which part of the transfer policy? Section 3 deals with transfers between
APNIC account holders while section 6 deals with corporate M&A activity.

Thanks,

Leo

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature