Re: [sig-policy] New Version of prop-103: A Final IP Address Policy Prop

To: Ren-Hung Hwang <rhhwang at gmail dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] New Version of prop-103: A Final IP Address Policy Proposal
From: Dean Pemberton <dean at deanpemberton dot com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:07:11 +1200
Cc: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>, SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <CAP2gc-4Y6aK10t1N=CL2iupnwExnGRLWkxHdnKoMEUnasTEPcQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAP2gc-4Y6aK10t1N=CL2iupnwExnGRLWkxHdnKoMEUnasTEPcQ@mail.gmail.com>

suggesting a solution at the time, but I don't believe it should be a
requirement.
It should be possible to start this process with a problem that you
don't know the solution to, and work with the rest of the community to
develop one.

Dean

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Ren-Hung Hwang <rhhwang at gmail dot com> wrote:

>
>>> I think the author(s) of the proposal should provide a
> initial/feasible solution as the start point for disussion.
>
>