Re: [sig-policy] New Version of prop-103: A Final IP Address Policy Prop
previous version.
As written however, I'm unsure of what the proposal would actually be
implementing.
The proposal states:
> IPv4 policy proposals should be carefully examined to ensure that they
> are really necessary
Agree!
> and they address real needs that can not be
> accomplished with existing processes.
No complaints here!
> Discussion of the problem should
> preceed proposals for new policy to address the problem.
Yep - agree once again. We would be better off talking about problems
and having a more inclusive method of going from a problem statement
to a policy proposal if necessary.
So I think the idea of Problem Statement -> Discussion -> Solutions
Proposed -> Discussion -> Policy Proposal is sound.
My question is how would we implement that, because at least a bit of
that should be included in this policy so we know what we're in for.
Regards,
Dean