Re: [sig-policy] prop-101 Returned to mailing list and Newversion posted

To: David Woodgate <dwoodgate5 at gmail dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-101 Returned to mailing list and Newversion posted
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:01:17 -0400
Cc: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <m2r4rg841p.wl%randy at psg dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AB8B3EC7241D4F9E98B01E494B0845C4@bb.local> <CALS-_OrLvxxgPt73AiqWPH_9Akuonz7PXzMks_VbkXsVDPEtYg@mail.gmail.com> <CACfPNNSsbtEGvRiWmmu1x2ErM4cLzwD+t+3wG0RVFRQUgGD=MQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMCFpiA1nzEK5KfL-n7xD1A+DbXACdHgJC8DZ7LNUB0s0aPNsw@mail.gmail.com> <4FE09BD6.5060902@verizon.com> <CALS-_Orjq2MZeV10HXiTdY89KdmyXWqD9CAEVf+oO5wziOcZOA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2652C.2030909@apnic.net> <CALS-_Oq2rWQnN47inbKBSWq9ST_AxBrPgMQoc7uuQZPb4pC-Lg@mail.gmail.com> <5020BEC2.2050307@gmail.com> <008e01cd7514$f6cd5560$266df1da@laptop4j> <50227D8A.3010606@gmail.com> <m2r4rg841p.wl%randy@psg.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> dump their entry in the routing table anyway, why do we need all this
> nit-picking detiled policy?
> 
> or, in other terms, what is the win in placing a barrier to entry in the
> market?

btw, this was meant to provoke discussion, not stifle it.

randy