Re: [sig-policy] Proposal 99
The example in your slides shows a situation where a /27 is required
over a multi year period but that under the current system this is
allocated as two /29s and a /28. Your presentation claims that this
causes problems with non-optimal network design.
I am interested to hear from Sanjaya or the hostmasters if this would
actually be a problem in reality.
If I were a member who came to APNIC with comprehensive documentation
showing a network rollout over 5 years which needed a /27, would this
be allocated under provisions in the following section of
apnic-089-v010
------
5.2.3 Larger initial allocations
Initial allocations larger than /32 may be justified if:
a) The organization provides comprehensive documentation of planned
IPv6 infrastructure which would require a larger allocation;
------
In other words, if I can show that I have a need for larger network,
can this be currently addressed without the need to change policy.
Regards,
Dean
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Xing Li <xing at cernet dot edu dot cn> wrote:
> Hi, Dean,
>
> Thanks for your question.
>
> Dean Pemberton 写道:
>
>> The proposal states the following:
>>
>> This proposal extends the IPv6 request process to allow large ISPs to
>> request multiple prefixes within a single, contiguous, reserved space.
>>
>> ------
>>
>> I would like to understand how this is not catered for already by the
>> sparse allocation policy employed by the APNIC host masters.
>> This policy states that subsequent allocations are made from a contiguous
>> range where possible.
>
>
> The current APNIC policy can ensure that subsequent allocations are made
> from a contiguous range. However, inside the SP's network, each Pop cannot
> have a contiguous range without renumbering of the addresses of initial
> allocation.
>
> The 099 will ensure the aggregated IPv6 range to the peers as well as
> aggregated IPv6 range in each Pop via multiple prefixes in the initial
> allocation, and subsequent allocation.
>
> The comparison is shown in the page 6 of my presentation at
> http://meetings.apnic.net/33/policy/agenda/proposal-099/prop-099-v1.pdf
>
> If you have any questions, please let me know.
>
> Regards,
>
> xing
>
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dean
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>> *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
>
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Dean