Re: [sig-policy] FW: prop-100 National IP Address Plan - Allocationof co
When I referred to respecting views, it was precisely over this thought that only skilled and experienced engineers can have opinions. :-)
Frankly, this proposal, while not limited to any specific country has a requirement for one large project in India.In my opinion, the same can be applied for without going through this policy process. Please comment.
Regards and best wishes,
Naresh Ajwani
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 28, 2011, at 7:48, Skeeve Stevens <Skeeve at eintellego dot net> wrote:
> Naresh,
>
> I realise that you think that people are not respecting views here in some
> casesŠ but the problem I see is that it is not a case of respect in this
> case.
>
> It is a simple matter of technical implementation and practicality and you
> are hearing the opinions of many many highly skilled and experienced
> engineers who have worked for large carriers and build world wide networks.
>
> India is no different to any other nation with regards to how its networks
> are built and runŠ you have to understand that we are all the same, and
> that the collective experience of the people who go to the APNIC
> conference is the most valuable opinion you will EVER get.
>
> ŠSkeeve
>
> --
> Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
> skeeve at eintellego dot net ; www.eintellego.net
> Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
> facebook.com/eintellego or eintellego at facebook dot com
> twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
>
> --
> eintellego - The Experts that the Experts call
> - Juniper - HP Networking - Cisco - Brocade
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <ajwaninaresh at gmail dot com>
> Reply-To: <ajwaninaresh at gmail dot com>
> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:22:30 +0000
> To: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>, <sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net>,
> <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] FW: prop-100 National IP Address Plan -
> Allocationof country-wide IP address blocks
>
>> Also, one hour tutorial shud take place on respecting views.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Naresh Ajwani
>> ------Original Message------
>> From: Randy Bush
>> Sender: sig-policy-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
>> To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> Sent: Aug 27, 2011 11:54 PM
>> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] FW: prop-100 National IP Address Plan -
>> Allocationof country-wide IP address blocks
>>
>> apnic meeting organizers and policy sig chairs,
>>
>> at this late date, is it possible to add a one hour tutorial on
>> inter-domain routing basics to the front of the policy sig meeting?
>> it appears as if we are going to need it to have the discussion of
>> prop-100 be at all reality based.
>>
>> if pfs won't give it, i will.
>>
>> randy
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>> *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
>>
>> Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Tata Indicom
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>> *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>