I have no problem removing the /36 provision from this policy entirely if it isn't needed in the APNIC region. Admittedly, it was copied from the policy which gained consensus in ARIN without significant analysis of the APNIC fee structures. A few people had commented to me that the issue it was intended to address in the ARIN region was also an issue in the APNIC region, so, I left it in. If that is not the case, I would really rather that we not drag down the rest of the benefits of this policy debating this (minor) aspect. Owen On Aug 3, 2011, at 8:54 PM, John Mann (ITS) wrote: Hi, |
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature