Re: [sig-policy] Call for policy proposals for APNIC 32
>>> distributing IPv4 addresses according to the final /8 policies.
>>
>> was that really the case? looking at geoff's numbers, it appears as if the
>> trigger may be been pulled a little early. could the secretariat comment?
>
> I have asked the Secretariat for more information on this. Are there
> specific points you want me to raise with them.
start with
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2011-April/035234.html
and then read up on TEPCO and whitewashing techniques :)
randy