[sig-policy] Summary of discussion: prop-94
Hash: SHA1
_______________________________________________________________________
prop-094: Adding alternative criteria to renumbering requirement in
final /8 policy
_______________________________________________________________________
Dear SIG members
Below is a summary of discussions on the proposal to date. We encourage
you to continue discussions on the mailing list before the Policy
SIG.
Regards,
Gaurab, Ching-Heng, and Terence
Proposal summary
- ----------------
This is a proposal to add an alternative criteria to the requirement for
organizations receiving their initial allocation from APNIC to renumber
out of their previously deployed space when they are allocated addresses
under the final /8 policy.
Discussion statistics
- ---------------------
Version 1 posted to Policy SIG mailing list: 25 January 2011
Number of posts since proposal first posted: 21
Number of people participating in discussions: 11
Summary of discussion to date
- -----------------------------
- There was a suggestion to set the level at 90% occupied rather
than 80% to reduce wasted space, although another point of view
was that 20% was not a great amount of wasted space. An author
confirmed that the 80% figure was chosen just to reflect existing
policy.
- There were concerns about disaggregation raised as a consequence
of this policy. Others doubted this would be significant.
- There was discussion about how difficult it would be for
operators to renumber.
- There was disagreement over whether the "new alternative
criteria" is more relaxed or more strict than pre-final /8
policy. One point of view was that the final /22 should be used
for Ipv6 deployment and that there should very few restrictions
on it.
- There was discussion about encouraging IPv6 adoption such as
ensuring every final /8 went to an organization with an IPv6
address block, or requiring a deployment plan.
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-094
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk1kZ84ACgkQSo7fU26F3X1XswCg5P0uHWufujZvgz0aM6I+gqK/
e7MAoLpOb4E2y3VxmWhjr4SIzARdZQCN
=0jCx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----