Date Prev
Date Next
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Date Index
Thread Index
Re: [sig-policy] prop-093: Reducing the minimum delegation size for the
To
: Randy Bush <
randy at psg dot com
>
Subject
: Re: [sig-policy] prop-093: Reducing the minimum delegation size for the final /8 policy
From
: Ren-Hung Hwang <
rhhwang at gmail dot com
>
Date
: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:53:54 +0800
Cc
:
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Delivered-to
:
sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
List-archive
: <
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy
>
List-help
: <
mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help
>
List-id
: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post
: <
mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
>
List-subscribe
: <
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>, <
mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>, <
mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe
>
>new sites needing to multi-home in a dual-stack backbone world, but who
>want to have their site be v6-only or dual-stack, will need a bit of
>ipv4 to front onto the net [0].
I agree, thus I support this policy proposal.
Ren-Hung Hwang
Date Prev
Date Next
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Date Index
Thread Index
Prev by Date:
Re: [sig-policy] prop-094: Adding alternative criteria to renumbering requirement in final /8 policy
Next by Date:
Re: [sig-policy] Fwd: Re: [nznog] Prop 94
Previous by thread:
Re: [sig-policy] prop-094: Adding alternative criteria to renumbering requirement in final /8 policy
Next by thread:
Re: [sig-policy] prop-089: Additional criterion for final /8 allocations (and assignments)
Index(es):
Date
Thread