On Jan 12, 2011, at 6:58 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Right. I was pointing out that if you still wanted to use /56s, Prop-90 includes provisions
that would allow you to do so. Essentially, if you did that, you'd face a situation of
N=56-(X+Y) rather than N=48-(X+Y) under Prop-90.
I'm not advocating that anyone do so (and, indeed, I don't see much sense in doing so),
but, I want to make sure the flexibility of the proposal is understood by the community.