Re: [sig-policy] prop-086: Global policy for IPv4 allocations by the IAN
On 8/26/10 5:13 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy at psg dot com> wrote:
>> As Philip noted, 'no proposal should meddle in a regions
>> affairs'. There is a clear correlation between the APNIC regions
>> non-needs based transfer policy and the ARIN region declining to
>> signup for mandatory address returns. 1:1.
>
> i.e. arin wants to meddle in other regions' affairs on transfer
>
>> Seems like the ball is squarely in the APNIC regions court.
>
> once again. all, that is ALL, regions except arin came to agreement on
> a policy. the location of the ball is pretty obvious.
>
> randy
How would you make this work?