Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructureassign
On 8/19/10 3:50 AM, Terry Manderson wrote:
> My other point is at the final APNIC /8 point AND the 203.119/16 is
> consumed I see very little difference between a new CI organisation
> and a LIR. Why should we bless one category in particular?
I asked for the data to see how fruitful the new policy is, and as I
noted, this policy even when approved is possibly going to be just a
policy. Critical Infrastructure assignments from the /8, is very
unlikely given he current data.
But, I'd still support the reservation for critical infrastructure. I
guess they would not be called 'critical infrastructure' if they were
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----