Re: [sig-policy] prop-081: Eligibility for assignments from the final /8

To: Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz dot org>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-081: Eligibility for assignments from the final /8
From: Jonny Martin <jonny at jonnynet dot net>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:51:46 +0600
Cc: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <4B679625.7090505 at lpnz dot org>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <m2y6jdkvda.wl%randy@psg.com> <4B679625.7090505@lpnz.org>

On Feb 2, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Andy Linton wrote:

This was to make the process simple and fair - everybody got one more
allocation (in today's terms, a /22) when we got to the last /8 - no
ifs, no buts, no maybes.

I don't support this change which makes the administration of thepolicy

more complex.

I agree with Andy here. I don't see a need to change the existing /8

proposal at this stage.


Cheers,
Jonny.