Re: [sig-policy] Prop-78 'Reserving /10 IPv4 address space to facilitate
On Jan 22, 2010, at 7:40 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> if longer route prefixes are more generally accepted, or a smaller
>> minimum allocation size takes effect, we can certainly reduce the size
>> of allocation under this policy to suit future needs. But right now
>> we are doing these based on current best pratice.
>
> you may find the wording of prop-062 interesting
>
> randy
What Randy means is that by explicitly defining the size of allocations under prop-062 as the minimum allocation permissible under current APNIC policies, it effectively externalizes that definition, thereby making the size an independently tunable factor. When (if) the APNIC community decides to embrace the idea of smaller minimum allocations in general, the new minimum will automatically apply to prop-062 allocations as well.