Terence,
ARIN and RIPE must have given a thought while proposing </24 assignments. What their proposal says about creating TOO many routes due to the same.
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
2010/1/21 천무호 <cmh at kisa dot or dot kr>
First, I thought the same as Ms. Terence.
I thought /24 will make too many routing tables.
But, I believe we can count on these days state-of-art technology.
billy from KR
----- 메일의 원문 -----
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>Sent: Thu Jan 21 16:31:27 KST 2010
To: Terence Zhang YH <zhangyinghao at cnnic dot cn>
Cc: sig-policy at apnic dot net
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Prop-78 'Reserving /10 IPv4 address spacetofacilitate IPv6 deployment' Comments> I think an allocation size </24 may creat too many routes in the
> global routing table
why do you think this? could you explain?
i suspect that the routing table size is driven mostly by multi-homing
with some traffic engineering.
randy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy