Re: [sig-policy] prop-074: IANA policy for allocation of ASN blocks to R
David Conrad wrote:
On Jul 24, 2009, at 12:03 AM, Sanjaya wrote:
• Out of the 97 assigned ASNs we know that:
- 85 were 16-bit (requested from start, reasons were supplied during
- 6 were 16-bit (swapped from 32-bit to 16-bit)
- 6 were 32-bit
Sorry, this is a bit confusing to me.
Is this indicating that of the 6 32-bit ASNs, all 6 were swapped with
16-bit ASNs or is it that there were 12 32-bit ASNs, of which 6 were
swapped to 16-bit?
It's the latter. There were 12 32-bit ASNs, of which 6 were swapped to 16-bit. Sorry for the confusion.
Out of curiosity, has there been any investigation as to what AS numbers
might be reasonably reclaimed?
prop-075 is one possibility :)
Join us for APNIC 28 in Beijing : 25-28 August 2009